June 15, 2001

NAPSTER ALTERNATIVES

Now that Napster has gone, other services are slowly coming up to speed for file sharing. It’s a slow process – the record companies have successfully created an atmosphere of fear and paranoia. Here’s an article about AudioGalaxy, a new service that operates similarly to Napster. It sounds like it’s on the verge of being overwhelmed by new users – and more importantly, I can’t imagine that it will be around for more than the blink of an eye before the record companies turn their doberman attorneys loose. But it certainly might be worth a look while it lasts.

[…] continued
Posted by Bruce Berls | June 15, 2001 4:21 pm
June 10, 2001

THE COPYRIGHT POLICE ARE WATCHING

The conventional wisdom has been that the record companies would target services like Napster with threats and lawsuits, but they would never attack individuals – for practical and PR reasons.

Forget it. The copyright police are watching.

The new services popping up to replace Napster – Gnutella and the like – do not use central servers. There’s no company to sue, just a lot of individuals sharing files. The record companies, movie studios, and independent bounty hunters are crawling all over those services, taking down IP addresses. Demands are made to the ISPs to reveal subscribers’ names, cut off accounts, and potentially open people up to being sued for sharing files. […] continued

Posted by Bruce Berls | June 10, 2001 8:55 am
May 22, 2001

DIGITAL COPYRIGHT

There’s a lot to learn about the copyright issues symbolized by the war against Napster. Copyright owners are waging a concerted battle with a single-minded goal: to make your every exposure to copyrighted material into an event that costs you money. In 1998 the Digital Millennium Copyright Act was presented as a benign update to old law, but its horrible consequences are going to reshape our world. The flow of information on the Internet may be constrained in ways that would shock you. Downloaded material – maybe even CDs and DVDs – may stop working after a fixed amount of time unless you keep paying. […] continued

Posted by Bruce Berls | May 22, 2001 9:43 pm
April 10, 2001

JURORS MISCALCULATE MP3.COM DAMAGES

My lawyer friends will appreciate this story. Last week jurors in a federal court trial in New York awarded $300,000 to an independent record label for copyright violations – delivered as 145 individual awards, one for each infringed song. The defendant, MP3.com, was ecstatic, since it’s already been stung with multimillion dollar verdicts in other cases, and the plaintiff in this case was seeking $8.5 million.

Over the weekend jurors read news accounts and started calling the judge to confess that they messed up. They meant to award three million dollars, you see, and just got tripped up by that hard multiplication and division stuff. […] continued

Posted by Bruce Berls | April 10, 2001 9:33 pm
April 5, 2001

MUSIC INDUSTRY FOLLOWUP

Here’s a good article that explains all the issues about file formats and pricing for downloadable music from the record labels – and concludes that they stand a good chance of getting it completely wrong.

[…] continued
Posted by Bruce Berls | April 5, 2001 7:58 am
April 4, 2001

RECORDING INDUSTRY GREED

Here’s a glimpse of the future according to the recording industry.

Like the announcement with RealNetworks a couple of days ago and MSN yesterday, MTV and VH1 are rolling out a service with the cooperation of the major record labels. It’s routine – Internet radio and the option to buy songs by downloading them. Still no information available on file format or the extent of the restrictions on the use of the downloaded files. But look at the prices! Anywhere from a buck to $2.50 for a single song, and anywhere from ten to eighteen bucks for an entire CD. Think about that! […] continued

Posted by Bruce Berls | April 4, 2001 10:54 pm
April 3, 2001

MUSICNET DETAILS

RealNetworks and three of the five biggest music companies announced a new Net music service yesterday. Notably absent was Universal – the biggest catalog, but also the most vociferous opponent of online music – and Sony, busy developing its own service.

RealNetworks intends to operate the infrastructure and make the entire back catalog from the three companies available for download or streaming into your computer. AOL and RealNetworks are the first companies to sign up to offer the service to consumers, but the library will be licensed to third parties, including Napster if it wants in.

All the interesting details have been left out of the announcement. […] continued

Posted by Bruce Berls | April 3, 2001 8:45 am
March 10, 2001

AFTER NAPSTER

Napster is gone. Its death may be more or less protracted, but it’s all over. There will now be a period of confusion – most of you will be well served by waiting until the dust settles. I’m a big fan of Media Jukebox, so I like their offer of $3 billion to the record industry to begin a new subscription-based source for legal online music. Here’s the web site they created to demonstrate their seriousness – afternap.com. (And I still encourage you to give Media Jukebox a try if you’re at all frustrated with RealJukebox, MusicMatch Jukebox, or Windows Media Player!)

[…] continued
Posted by Bruce Berls | March 10, 2001 10:02 am
February 25, 2001

NAPSTER DAYS ARE NUMBERED

Even if Napster survives the court case, it won’t be fun for much longer. In addition to its plans for paid subscriptions, Napster now plans to add a “protection layer” to .mp3 files during their progress from someone else’s computer to your computer. The “protection” would prevent you, for example, from making an audio CD from the .mp3 file. Here’s an article about Napster’s plans.
There will be a period of confusion after Napster either shuts down or becomes annoying, but don’t worry. It’s a safe bet that downloadable music is here to stay.

[…] continued
Posted by Bruce Berls | February 25, 2001 11:06 pm
Pages: Prev 1 2 3 ...7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17